Yeah i'm kind of annoyed at the american seller listing on trade me now.. at like 20% or more of what you can find those items for, because we are backward kiwi's so its ok?
so the guy has replied again and completely dodged any verification of the model.
(Q) ; Yes i mostly army build and collect other more recent lines, as being able to assure that vintage stuff is really what it says it is has become so very hard its normally easier to find these items in person, Just the only other picture of this i had seen was in red but it'd be easier to spend that kind of cash if i knew for sure is all. ^_^
(A)stamp on lukes *censored* doesnt lie. i can sit here anf type all good things - use must decide if its worth what you want to spend
(Q)Hi, i've done a little research, there is a figure from 1996/7 which looks similar in design with slightly closer colours however it isn't a complete match. you mentioned mixed parts perhaps it is a mis-match custom of an older base and newer cloth covering, what date did you buy it? Thanks, sorry to be such a bother i just want to be sure, what kind of price is finding out by the way?
(A)figure is stamped 1978 on its backside - I have owned it for almost 20 years. you would know that many toys & their accesories are recycled into new lines - look at the ROTJ toys that made it into the robin hood price of thieves toy line - ewok village ,ewok catpult, gamorean guard. friar tuck,do some research on the $6 mill dollar man toy line & see whats been borrowed from there for this figure.$25O is a pittance to pay for quality stuff - i recently sold a pencil sharpener for $750 US
(Q)I'd really be interested in how much was it going to cost to get somebody to evaluate it? Sorry but 250$ is a high price to pay if it is fake, but a great deal if it is what it says it is, Just i can't find anywhere telling me it is a real production. And we both know that production marks can be copied or the base could be an entirely different figure.
--- I doubt he'll keep answering, considering he has no evidence besides "i've had it for 20 years" and "they re-use parts from other figures" which may or not be true, but clearly admits that faking it can be much easier.
Is there a resource we can use to prove its fake?
its been up before so i don't think anyone will fall for it.